Thursday, August 29, 2013

On the Wrong Side of Hypocrisy: TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE DAY in TN

"For Marriage Equality" Inks on Bristol / 2013
Love is the only tradition the human race needs to worry about- or rather not worry about.  Love in all its forms has moved humanity forward millions and millions of years.  Without love, man would not strive to lift one another up as well as create and nourish new life.  Love is not limited to the human race but is the basis of the entire animal kingdom's will to survive.  Love is beyond definitions and above limitations.

Here in the United States and especially in my home state of Tennessee, authorities have time after time placed limitations on the legal definitions of relationships as well as the social benefits which go along with such unions.  This year, August 31st has been declared "Traditional Marriage Day" by Senate Joint Resolution 134.  Turning a biased eye from the supposed separation of Church and State set forth by our Founding Fathers, the second line of this bill authored by the Tennessee State Senate reads:

"WHEREAS, in Genesis 2:24, matrimony is delineated; it is expressed only between a man and a wife."

Champions for this legislation would argue the resolution defends the sanctity of marriage as far as promoting couples to stay or get married for the sake of their children and their own well-being.  The bill goes on to expand its verbiage in regards to marriage and the drawbacks of single parenting.  Of course without the wool drying out your eyes you can clearly see first and foremost, this bill cites The Holy Bible in its affront to the current Civil Rights struggle of the LGBT community in their quest for States to recognize Gay Marriage.  

So what is "Traditional Marriage" here in Tennessee?  It's certainly not a union between one man and one man (or one woman and one woman.)  Is it the union joining one man and one woman? Is it the union of one white man and one white woman?  It may surprise some to know to this day, the Tennessee State Constitution bars interracial couples from marrying as far as those with African American ancestry are concerned.  Article XI: Miscellaneous Provisions: Section 14 reads:

"The intermarriage of white persons with negroes, mulattoes, or persons of mixed blood, descended from a negro to the third generation inclusive of their living together as man and wife in this State is prohibited. The legislature shall enforce this section by appropriate legislation."

Does the Bible also lay out marital limitations to follow as far as race is concerned?  No, just as it does not state anywhere within its texts a condemnation of homosexual love.  Neither the State, the Federal Government or the Church have the authority to determine who you can love.  In the age of the 24 hour news cycle, we often lose perspective on what is "recent" history.  It was less than 50 years ago (in an estimated 2-7 million year human history) that the United States Supreme Court made a landmark decision in Loving vs. Virginia with regards to interracial marriage in 1967:  
“The Fourteenth Amendment,” Chief Justice Warren wrote, “requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations.  Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the state.”

 Later that year, the first interracial marriage in Tennessee's history took place on the heels of this case rooting in Virginia.  In lieu of the Federal decision, many southern states never officially legalized interracial marriage.  The Tennessee State Constitution has to this day never been amended to recognize the binding of white and black people in holy matrimony. While Tennessee just can't bring themselves around to passing an amendment to clarify their stance on this sort of union, they had absolutely no trouble adding even more provisions in 2006.  Entitled the Marriage Protection Amendment, Title 36 Chapter 23 Part 1 of Tennessee Code states:

Any policy, law or judicial interpretation that purports to define marriage as anything other than the historical institution and legal contract between one (1) man and one (1) woman is contrary to the public policy of Tennessee.

Of course, Federal Law has contradicted as well as superseded State Laws before as mentioned above.  Given their stubborn history, we can assume this will never see amending in Tennessee no matter the outcome of future Gay Marriage debates at the Federal level.   In these regards, every day is "Traditional Marriage Day" in Tennessee for those who would see it as one White Christian Man and one White Christian Woman legally living as man and wife.  

Traditional is in its first description defined as "an inherited, established, or customary pattern of thought, action, or behavior."  The tradition bringing all of us here today is love.  Without it, we cease to exist and we lack the initiative which builds communities and families.  Love is defined in the eye of the beholder as it is beyond verbal or societal definition.  Love is not limited to race, social standing or gender.  We should reexamine or history and decide to limit religion's role to the Church and love's role to the Home and Community.  Certainly, neither have a place in Politics. 

This weekend, rallies will be held here in Tennessee representing both sides of this issue which has been magnified by Traditional Marriage Day.  In response, August 31st has also been proclaimed Tennessee Marriage Equality Day by the Tennessee Equality Project.  Which Side of History (or Hypocrisy) will you be on?  

Click HERE for Tennessee Marriage Equality Day rally locations and details!  

8 comments:

  1. I know that there are legal troubles facing same sex couples in the USA, but for the first time, I hear about restrictions for interracial marriages. Besides the 'Traditional Marriage Day' which is quite loony, are there any consequences interracial couples have to face after their marriage?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The conundrum of our current policies lies within the Federal Governments laws conflicting with State Laws. In the case of Interracial Marriage, it is an assumed right since the late 1960's decision of the Supreme Court. However, despite the court's decision on Gay marriage this year, States aren't as willing to take the assumptive stance that they HAVE to allow the marriages to take place. This is why law as we know it is a facade.

      Delete
  2. nice issue you have raised hardin. can u plz give any specific reason why your state has not allowed gay marriage if federal Government has passed the rule. this is really teasing for the homosexual community.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's kinda mind boggling Jerry. It seems that within months of the Supreme Court upholding Interracial Marriage, most states had made it legal. I think the tricky part about the Gay Marriage ruling this year was they deemed a law unconstitutional which outlawed Same Sex Marriage as opposed to upholding a law which legalized it. They're basically saying States can't make it illegal but aren't required to make it legal. Only in America right?

      Delete
  3. they should allow gay and lesbian marriage all around the state. rules must be same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I couldn't agree more. We need a national standard.

      Delete
    2. I thought so all around the state are not allow the marriage for gay and lesbian and i definitely not agree..

      Delete
  4. Excellent article. The blog is useful and more informatics. I think all searchers like this kind of article. Thanks for blog admin who write these useful article. If anyone want to search more Please visit this site, lose weight hypnosis

    ReplyDelete

If you brought two cents, leave them here...